Georgetown Learning Community – Course Descriptions
Science, Faith and the New Atheism
Prof. John Haught
Tuesday, March 10, 17, and 24 from 11:00 am – 12:30 pm
In three sessions, a retired Georgetown professor interested in the topic of science and theology looks again at the New Atheists whose books became bestsellers a couple decades ago. His motive for doing so is that in the intellectual world today, many scientists and philosophers still approve, explicitly or implicitly, of the atheist manifestoes of Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens. Their books and arguments are very much alive in the contemporary dialogue of science and theology. This brief program will summarize the arguments and offer several critical responses to them. It will also look for the participants’ reactions and contributions. (Recommended reading: John F Haught, God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens (Westminster/John Knox Press, 2008).
John F. Haught (Ph. D. Catholic University, 1970) is Distinguished Research Professor, Georgetown University, Washington DC. He was formerly Professor in the Department of Theology at Georgetown University (1970-2005) and Chair (1990-95). His area of specialization is systematic theology, with a particular interest in issues pertaining to science, cosmology, evolution, ecology, and religion. Among the books he published are Resting on the Future: Catholic Theology for an Unfinished Universe (New York: Bloomsbury Press, 2015), Science and Faith: A New Introduction (New York: Paulist Press, 2012), Making Sense of Evolution: Darwin, God, and The Drama of Life (Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, February 2010) and God and the New Atheism: A Critical Response to Dawkins, Harris, and Hitchens (Louisville: 2003). He lectures internationally on many issues related to science and religion. In 2002 he was the winner of the Owen Garrigan Award in Science and Religion and in 2004 the Sophia Award for Theological Excellence and in Fall 2008 he held the D’Angelo Chair in the Humanities at St. John’s University in New York City. In April 2009 he received an honorary doctorate from Louvain University, Belgium.
The Medical School Gross Anatomy Experience
Dr. Carlos Suarez-Quian
Wednesday, March 11, 18, and 25 from 11:00 am – 12:30 pm
1) A Brief History of Gross Anatomy – We are all “Caught” Up – From Aristotle to the MRI 2) Heart and Lungs – Beep, Beep, Beep, Beep, Breathe 3) The Abdomen – A Tube Runs Through It
The objectives of the presentations are: 1) how medical schools developed by first studying the human body, 2) the anatomy of the heart and lungs taught to physicians and how life is dependent on these two organs (and what happens when they fail), and 3) the organs found within the abdomen, why they matter, and how they fail us.
Carlos A. Suárez-Quian, Ph.D., is an Emeritus Professor in the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cellular Biology at the Georgetown University School of Medicine. His teaching expertise is in clinical gross anatomy, where he served as gross anatomy discipline director of the first- and fourth-year medical school curriculum for over 20 years. He is also a published textbook author, speaker, visiting faculty member, and consultant on clinical gross anatomy programs around the world. Dr. Suárez-Quian was a funded research scientist with a concentration in cell and molecular biology, during which time he published more than 60 papers in peer-reviewed journals, including for a technique he pioneered called “laser capture microdissection”. He was a founding member and co-director of the Georgetown Medical Center Mini Medical School Program for over 25 years. Dr. Suárez-Quian served as one of 15 national judges for the annual Regeneron Science Competition (formerly Intel) that awards over 1.5 million in scholarships to high school seniors, now in its 78th year.
Dr. Suárez-Quian’s teaching awards include the Golden Apple and the Geza Illes Award in Gross Anatomy, and the Kaiser-Permanente Teaching Award granted by his faculty peers. In May 2008, Dr. Suárez-Quian was inducted into the MAGIS Society of Master Teachers, the highest award Georgetown bestows on a faculty member at the Medical School. He is the author of the Online Guided Gross Anatomy Dissector (Oxford University Press, 2014), and co-author of The Clinical Anatomy of the Cranial Nerves, by J.A. Vilensky, W.M. Robertson and C.A. Suárez-Quian (Wiley, 2015). He published the eight-book series of All-in-One Anatomy Exam Review: Image-Based Questions and Answers with his co-author, Dr. Vilensky. He is also the co-author of Functional Anatomy for Occupational Therapy (Books of Discovery Press, 2022), now in over 140 programs nationwide.
A native of La Habana, Cuba, Dr. Suárez-Quian came to the United States as a political refugee when he was seven years old. He is the son of Andrés Suárez and Hortensia Quian. He grew up in Miami and Gainesville, Florida, earned his B.S. at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, did his graduate work at the Harvard University Medical School, and his post-doctorate work at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Despite being Cuban, he does not enjoy cigars.
The Unexamined Life is Not Worth Living
Prof. Frank Ambrosio
Tuesday, March 31, April 7 and 14 from 11:00 am – 12:30pm
If a student were to ask me to recommend one book in philosophy that any educated person should have read, there would be no hesitation in recommending The Apology of Socrates by Plato. It is basically rather short and can be read in two hours, yet it is the cornerstone of Western ethical and political thought. It reads as Socrates’ “defense” against capital charges brought against him by his fellow Athenian citizens, immediately after the humiliating defeat by Sparta that ended Athens’ golden age.
But the title is deceptively ironic; far from being an attempt to excuse himself of wrongdoing, Socrates turns his defense into a frontal attack on the powerful Athenian establishment for being their own worst enemies. It is an explanation of why he has chosen to make his own way of life altogether different from theirs. The speech earned him a death sentence, but his conclusion was that he was better off than his detractors. “Nothing can harm a good person in life or after death, and their fate is not a matter of indifference to the Universe.” What could possibly support such an audacious claim?
Far from being an abstract discussion of concepts or theories, Socrates’ Apology has stood for more than two millennia as an unsurpassed statement of what every human life amounts to in the end, a declaration of how and why one has decided to live, for better or worse, in precisely the way they have.
Frank Ambrosio is Associate Professor of Philosophy, Emeritus, at Georgetown University. After studies in Italian language and literature in Florence, Italy, he completed his doctoral degree at Fordham University with a specialization in contemporary European Philosophy.
He is the founding Director, with Edward Maloney, of the Georgetown University “My Dante Project”, a web-based platform for personal and collaborative study of Dante’s Commedia. In 2014, he acted as lead instructor for the launch of an ongoing web-based course (MOOC) on Dante offered by EDX (http://dante.georgetown.edu), which currently has been utilized by over 20,000 students. He has received five separate awards from Georgetown University for excellence in teaching. He is the former Director of the Doctor of Liberal Studies Program, and in 2015, he received the Award for Faculty Achievement from the American Association of Graduate Liberal Studies Programs. His most recent book is Dante and Derrida: Face to Face (State University of New York Press). In 2009, The Great Courses Program issued his 36-lecture course, Philosophy, Religion and the Meaning of Life.
Heroic Youth and Homecoming in Greek Tragedy
Dr. Victoria Pedrick
Thursday, April 9, 16, 23 and 30 from 11:00 am – 12:30 pm
We usually think about the hero’s journey in epic terms. The challenges and dangers of the quest, the feats of conquest and survival, test and prove his valor, his worth, in short, his very identity, because these are the deeds for which he will be forever remembered and glorified. But spectators at the Athenian festival of Dionysus, where the great tragedies were staged throughout the fifth century BCE, observed a very different kind of journey, one that took young men not out into the world for glory but back to the home, to the past from which they sprang. In this course, we will examine the young hero’s tragic journey in four ancient tragedies: Aeschylus’ Libation-Bearers; Euripides’ Electra; Sophocles’ Philoctetes, and Euripides’ Bacchae. In each, a youth travels back to the heart of who he was born to be. Aeschylus’ Libation-Bearers and Euripides’ Electra are two of the three tragedies we have, one by each tragedian, that explore the homecoming of Orestes, exiled by his mother Clytemnestra, mourned by his sister Electra, and finally returning home to murder his mother in revenge for the murder of his father Agamemnon. It is as if, for these great playwrights, the problem of matricide resists simple answers to the questions of fate and character at the heart of this young man’s story. In our first two weeks, we examine how the plays of Aeschylus and Euripides intersect and contest one another on these questions and more. Sophocles’ Philoctetes offers a stunning dramatization of Achilles’ young son, Neoptolemus, who is caught between two heroes of the Trojan War, Odysseus and Philoctetes, who wish to claim him as their heroic heir. In this play, the notion of homecoming is apparently only symbolic, either a ‘return’ to the heroism that Achilles embodied in life or a commitment to the kind of heroism that wins wars. But, unexpectedly, Neoptolemus’ choice either to return home or go to war becomes literal and tragic. Euripides’ Bacchae, the most famous of the tragedies, dramatizes the literal homecoming of a young god, Dionysus, as well as the shocking events that bring the youthful king of Thebes, Pentheus, back into the embrace of his mother and aunts, all crazed by the god they reject.
Victoria Pedrick received her Ph.D. from the University of Cincinnati and her BA from Emory University. She primarily taught courses in Greek and Latin language and literature, with a particular interest in Archaic and Classical Greek literature and culture. She also taught an introduction to Classical myth. In all her courses, she encourages students to focus on the audience and cultural contexts for ancient texts, including, when appropriate, modern engagement. She has published essays on Homer, Greek Tragedy, and Latin Lyric as well as two volumes on tragedy, one a collection of essays and the other a study of Euripides and Freud. This book studies the construction of identity within the context of originary or primal trauma as it is articulated in Euripides’ Ion and Freud’s case history of the Wolfman. She is currently writing a book on Greek myths about human violations against nature, including the cardinal cultural act of sailing, the deliberate desecration of sacred trees, and the wholly unnatural act of flying.
Implicit Bias—How our brains “trick” us into acting in ways that don’t align with our values.
Dr. Suzanne Bronheim
Monday, April 13, 20, and 27 from 10:30 am – 12:00 pm
We may think that all our responses in life are based on fair-minded thinking, but research has shown that in many areas of life unconscious or implicit bias actually shapes people’s actions. This course will explore the meaning of implicit bias, how it impacts our lives every day, how our brains work to “trick” us and what we can do about our own biases.
Suzanne Bronheim is an Adjunct Associate Research Professor in the Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington, D.C. She has been on the faculty of the Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development (GUCCHD) (now the THRIVE Center), for the past 50 years and has served in many capacities. She is a licensed clinical psychologist with a specialization in child and pediatric psychology. Dr. Bronheim has published widely on issues related to psychosocial needs of children and youth with chronic and fatal illnesses and creating coordinated community-based services to serve them and their families. She has provided clinical services and consultation for children and adults with an array of disabilities and special health care needs.
As a Senior Policy Associate within the National Center for Cultural Competence over the past 20 years, she has provided training and technical assistance to state Title V programs, state SIDS and infant mortality programs, non-profit organizations, health care providers, and public health workers on addressing cultural and linguistic competence in systems, services, and supports. Dr. Bronheim has written and produced effective products for the field and implemented research about the role of cultural and linguistic competence, self-assessment tools and processes, and the impact of bias on health and mental health disparities.